STOCKTON, CA – Bankruptcy filings require complete honesty, and several actions can create fraud problems in a Chapter 7 or Chapter 13 case, including hidden assets, false statements made under oath, and property transfers intended to keep assets away from creditors. California bankruptcy attorney Alia Khan Abedelal of Khan Law (https://akhanlawoffices.com/what-kind-of-actions-can-be-considered-fraudulent-in-a-bankruptcy-case/) is offering guidance to Stockton-area filers on the federal laws that define bankruptcy fraud and the consequences that can follow when fraud is detected.

According to California bankruptcy attorney Alia Khan Abedelal, bankruptcy fraud is a federal offense under 18 U.S.C. Section 157, which makes it illegal to use the bankruptcy process to execute or conceal a scheme to defraud. Related federal provisions address concealing property from a trustee, making false oaths or claims, or withholding records, and these offenses can carry a fine, up to five years in federal prison, or both. “Many people don’t realize that bankruptcy fraud isn’t limited to debtors alone,” explains Abedelal. “Creditors, trustees, attorneys, and even bankruptcy petition preparers can also be held responsible for fraudulent conduct.”

California bankruptcy attorney Alia Khan Abedelal notes that hiding assets remains one of the most common fraud concerns in Chapter 7 cases. Every asset, including bank accounts, vehicles, real property, and cash held outside financial institutions, must be listed on the bankruptcy schedules regardless of value or believed exemption status. Failing to disclose property or transferring it to a family member or friend before filing can lead a trustee to seek recovery of the asset and may contribute to a denial of discharge under 11 U.S.C. Section 727.

Attorney Khan adds that property transfers made shortly before filing are closely reviewed by the bankruptcy trustee. Under 11 U.S.C. Section 548, a trustee may avoid transfers made within two years before filing if the debtor acted with intent to hinder, delay, or defraud creditors, or received less than reasonably equivalent value in return. “Selling property for far less than it’s worth, or signing it over to someone else right before filing, can raise serious questions,” Khan notes. “California’s voidable-transfer law can allow a trustee to look back even further in certain situations.”

The firm also points to the risk of incurring significant debt shortly before filing, such as luxury purchases or large cash advances, which can create separate dischargeability problems. For cases filed on or after April 1, 2025, consumer debts over $900 for luxury goods owed to a single creditor within 90 days of filing, and cash advances exceeding $1,250 within 70 days of filing, are presumed nondischargeable under 11 U.S.C. Section 523(a)(2).

Khan further explains that preferential payments made to one creditor shortly before filing are not automatically considered fraud, though a trustee may reverse certain payments made within 90 days before filing under 11 U.S.C. Section 547, or within one year for payments made to insiders such as family members or business partners. False statements made under oath at the 341 meeting of creditors, or the filing of falsified financial documents, are addressed separately under 18 U.S.C. Section 152 and can carry the same criminal exposure as other forms of bankruptcy fraud.

The firm notes that the Office of the U.S. Trustee plays a central role in monitoring bankruptcy filings for signs of fraud, and that a bankruptcy trustee may compare a debtor’s schedules, tax returns, and bank records against the testimony given at the 341 meeting. Suspected fraud may also be referred to the U.S. Attorney or to federal law enforcement for further review. If fraud is established, consequences can include denial of discharge, loss of an exemption in property that was concealed or improperly transferred, dismissal of the case, and potential federal criminal prosecution carrying up to five years in prison and substantial fines.

“Consistency across every filing, from tax returns to bank statements to testimony, is essential,” Khan advises. “Trustees compare these documents closely, and even unintentional discrepancies can raise questions that are better addressed before a case is filed.” She adds that working with legal counsel before filing can help identify potential disclosure issues early, reducing the risk of a fraud-related finding later in the case.

For individuals preparing to file Chapter 7 or Chapter 13 bankruptcy in Stockton, San Joaquin County, or elsewhere in California, reviewing financial records and disclosures with an experienced bankruptcy attorney before the case is filed may help reduce the risk of fraud-related complications and protect the assets debtors expect to keep.

About Khan Law:

Khan Law is a Stockton-based law firm focused on Chapter 7 and Chapter 13 bankruptcy matters for individuals and families throughout San Joaquin County and California. Led by attorney Alia Khan Abedelal, the firm emphasizes careful preparation, honest disclosure, and clear communication throughout the bankruptcy process. For consultations, call (800) 419-8950.

Embed:

GMB: https://www.google.com/maps?cid=16970391916326035974

Email and website

Email: [email protected]

Website: https://akhanlawoffices.com/

Media Contact
Company Name: Alia Khan Law
Contact Person: Alia Khan
Email: Send Email
Phone: (800) 419-8950
Address:11 S San Joaquin St
City: Stockton
State: California 95202
Country: United States
Website: https://akhanlawoffices.com/